Pesticides & Wildlife-Small Grains

Prepared by:
William E. Palmer, Wildlife Graduate Research Assistant
Peter T. Bromley, Extension Wildlife Specialist
John R. Anderson, Jr., Crop Science Extension Specialist

Dated 2/92
Placed on the Web 3/95 by the Department of Entomology, NCSU


Wildlife is an important part of a healthy rural environment. This fact sheet is one of a series that describes how pesticides can be manageed to minimize harm to wildlife on our farms, in our waters, and in our forests.

Wildlife is a valuable natural resource. Most farmers enjoy seeing wildlife on their farm, and many benefit economically by leasing hunting and fishing rights to sportsmen. Hunters and fishermen in North Carolina spend more than $1 billion pursuing their sport each year.

Small grains provide food and cover to many wildlife species. Birds such as mourning doves feed on small grain seeds planted in the fall. Quail and songbirds feed on insects and other food items in small grain fields during spring. Wildlife also find food and cover in areas adjacent to crop fields, such as hedgerows, unmowed ditch banks, and field borders.

Pesticides used on small grains can harm wildlife. For example, exposure to a highly toxic insecticide can cause sickness or death. Once sick, wildlife may neglect their young, abandon their nests, and become more susceptible to predation and disease. Pesticides can harm wildlife indirectly as well. When herbicides or insecticides are sprayed on field borders and other noncrop habitats, wildlife lose valuable escape cover and food. Studies on game birds have shown that maintaining noncrop areas in wildlife habitat can increase populations.

Careful selection and use of pesticides, however, can lessen their impact upon wildlife. This publication (1) describes how pesticides used on small grains can harm wildlife and (2) describes how farmers can minimize adverse effects of pesticides on wildlife.

Insecticides

Many organophosphate and carbamate insecticides that are used on small grains are highly toxic to wildlife; these include carbofuran (Furadan), dimethoate (Cygon), disulfoton (Di-Syston), methomyl (Lannate), and methyl parathion. Wildlife are exposed to insecticides when they eat chemical residues on plants or in insects. Wildlife that are in fields or enter fields soon after an insecticide has been sprayed are exposed when they inhale vapor or when insecticides contact their skin or eyes. Such exposure can be substantial. In Virginia, researchers found that 60 percent of quail harvested by hunters had insecticide residues in their bodies.

Exposure to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides disrupts an animal's nervous system. Exposure to highly toxic insecticides can lead to sickness and death. The nervous system of the sickened animal may not return to normal for several weeks following exposure. Animals made sick by an insecticide are more likely to die if they are exposed again.

Tables 1 and 2 list insecticides recommended in the North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual for use on small grains. Table 1 rates insecticides according to their toxicities to birds, mammals, and fish. The effects of insecticides on wildlife and fish can be minimized by using the least toxic alternatives. Insecticides in Table 2 are rated low, moderate, or high based on the hazard their use presents to wildlife (birds and mammals). The hazard of an insecticide is based on its toxicity to wildlife, the way it is used, and other characteristics, such as its persistence in the environment. For example, methomyl (Lannate) is acutely toxic to birds and mammals (Table 1). However, because methomyl does not persist in the field, careful use of this chemical presents only a moderate hazard to wildlife (Table 2). Wildlife exposed to insecticides rated high may die or become sick. Insecticides rated moderate may also cause death or sickness, although death is unlikely. Insecticides rated low are unlikely to harm wildlife.

Table 1.    Toxicity of Pesticides Used on Small Grains to Birds, Mammals,
            and Fish.

Pesticide (Brand Name) Birds* Mammals* Fish**
azinphos-methyl (Guthion) H*** H EH carbaryl (Sevin) L L M carbofuran (Furadan) H*** H H chlorpyrifos (Lorsban H L EH dimethoate (Cygon) H*** M M Disulfoton (Di-Syston) H*** H H malathion L L EH methomyl (Lannate) H H H methyl parathion H*** H H
*Wildlife hazard is based on the following toxicities: H (Highly toxic) = LD50 less than 30 mg/kg and LC50 less than 500 ppm. M (Moderately toxic) = LD50 greater than 30 and less than 100 mg/kg and/or LC50 greater than 5 500 and less than 1,000 ppm. L (Low toxicity) = LD50 greater than 100 mg/kg and LC50 greater than 1,000 ppm. NT (Not toxic) **Fish 96-hour LC50 toxicities are as follows: EH (Extremely toxic) less than 0.1 ppm H (Highly toxic) 0.1 to 1.0 ppm M (Moderately toxic) 1 to 10 ppm L (Low toxicity) greater than 10 ppm To convert fish toxicities to pounds of active ingredient per acre-foot of water, multiply by 2.7. ***Active ingredient (not necessarily a specific product) has caused wildlife deaths. Table 2. Hazard of Insecticides Used on Small Grains and Sorghum to Wildlife
Wildlife Insect Insecticide (Brand Name) hazard* Kills** Comments
Insect Control in Small Grains
Aphids disulfoton (Di-Syston) high yes Methyl parathion is toxic to bees. dimethoate (Cygon) high yes Malathion is the encapsulated methyl safest material for parathion (Penncap-M) moderate no wildlife. Disulfoton methyl parathion high yes is less hazardous when malathion low no applied directly to soil.
Cereal azinphos-methyl (Guthion) high yes Methyl parathion is carbaryl (Sevin) low no toxic to bees. encapsulated methyl Azinphos-methyl and parathion (Penncap-M) moderate no methomyl are toxic to malathion low no wildlife. Sevin and methomyl (Lannate) moderate no malathion are safer for wildlife.
Fall methomyl (Lannate) moderate no Treat only when IPM armyworm thresholds are exceeded.
True carbaryl (Sevin) low no Carbaryl and trichlor- armyworm encapsulated methyl fon are safest for parathion (Penncap-M) moderate no wildlife. Best results methomyl (Lannate) moderate no occur when tempera- methyl parathion high yes tures are warm and trichlorfon (Dylox, caterpillars are Proxol) low no active.
Insect Control in Sorghum
Aphids dimethoate (Cygon) high yes Malathion is safer malathion low no than dimethoate.
Cinch bug carbaryl (Sevin) low no
Corn carbaryl (Sevin) low no Although methomyl is earworm chlorpyrifos (Lorsban) moderate no the material of Fall methomyl (Lannate) moderate no choice, it is highly armyworms toxic and care should Webworms be taken to avoid armyworms drift of material into wildlife habitats.
Sorghum carbaryl (Sevin) low no Carbaryl has low midge toxicity to most birds and mammals.


*Wildlife hazards:

Granular Insecticides

Granular formulations of insecticides are a real hazard to birds. Birds eat granules exposed on the soil surface, mistaking them for food or grit. Just a few granules may be enough to kill a small bird, such as a quail. Whenever granular formulations are used, the hazard to wildlife can be reduced by fully incorporating the granules into the soil. It is especially important to disk under granules spilled at row ends where birds are likely to search for food.

To reduce the danger to wildlife from granular formulations:

Liquid Insecticides

The danger to wildlife of liquid formulations of insecticides depends mainly on their toxicity and use. The toxicity of foliar-applied insecticides to wildlife range from low to high. Methyl parathion, azinphos-methyl (Guthion), disulfoton (Di-Syston), and dimethoate (Cygon) are highly toxic to wildlife but has not been reported to cause wildlife mortality.

Carbaryl (Sevin) and malathion present a low hazard to wildlife. Trichlorfon (Dylox, Proxol) is also relatively safe.

To reduce danger to wildlife from liquid insecticides:

Several studies of aerial applications of pesticides have reported significant drift of material into nearby wildlife habitats. If it is necessary to use highly toxic insecticides, apply them with ground equipment; this will help to minimize drift and reduce the hazard to wildlife. Ground application may also allow wildlife more time to leave the area during the spraying operation.

Drift can be minimized by using application equipment with low drift characteristics, replacing inappropriate or worn nozzles, using appropriate pressure and volume for the chosen nozzle, and the addition of a drift control agent. Ultra-low-volume sprays are more likely to cause drift then low-pressure sprays. Finally, never spray when the wind is blowing faster than 8 mph.

Fungicides

Fungicides used in small grain fields and sorghum fields include foliar sprays and seed treatments. Fungicides currently used on small grains and sorghum have a low toxicity to birds and mammals and do not present a hazard to wildlife. Some fungicides are toxic to fish; they include mancozeb (Dithane M-45, Penncozeb, Manzate 200). Triadimefon (Bayleton) and propiconazole (Tilt) are only moderately to slightly toxic to fish.

Fungicide use can be reduced by controlling diseases with cultural practices such as longer rotations, timely planting, and careful seed selection (see Extension Service publication AG-419-7, Small Grain Production Guide No. 7, Disease Management.

Herbicides

Most herbicides used during small grain production are only slightly toxic to wildlife. One exception is paraquat (Gramoxone), which is moderately toxic to birds and can cause abnormal growth of embryos in some bird eggs. Waterfowl eggs are particularly sensitive to paraquat. Generally, however, herbicides do not directly affect wildlife. More often, herbicides affect wildlife by damaging their habitats.

Wildlife need food and cover to survive. When wildlife habitats on a farm are lacking or of poor value, wildlife populations decline. Noncrop areas adjacent to crop fields, such as ditch banks, field borders, and filter strips, can provide habitat for wildlife if managed correctly. These strip habitats can provide nesting areas, protection from predators, and travel corridors for wildlife.

Several management techniques can be used to improve strip habitats for wildlife. Protect field borders and other habitats from herbicides. Mow strip habitats only once per year, preferably during early spring. If possible, mow on a two- year rotation. For example, mow one side of a ditch bank and filter strip in the first year and the other side in the second year. Disking field borders and filter strips, rather than mowing, stimulates growth of favorable wildlife food plants. Where wildlife are a priority, create filter strips and field borders no less than 12 feet in width. Cost-sharing programs are available to develop filter strips. Filter strips also protect water quality by reducing runoff of pesticides and soil.

Ways to Reduce Pesticide Use

Reducing pesticide use is one of the best ways to protect fish and wildlife resources. Using sound cultural practices reduces pest problems and, therefore, results in lower pesticide use. Cultural practices that decrease the need for pesticides include rotating crops, selecting resistant varieties, maintaining proper fertility, planting and harvesting at the proper time, and using integrated pest management (IPM) techniques. IPM is a farming approach that employs alternative methods of pest control, rather then relying solely on agrichemicals. With IPM, pesticides are used only when the cost of applying a pesticide is outweighed by the cost of pest damage to the crop. This "threshold" level must be reached before chemical pest control is economically justified. In this way, IPM practices help to reduce pesticide use and protect wildlife and the environment. For further information on alternatives to pesticides use, see the list of additional readings at the end of this publication.

Remember These Tips To Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources

For Further Information

Other publications that discuss pesticides and the protection of wildlife are listed below. For further information on this topic, contact your county Extension Service agent.

Additional publications in the Pesticides and Wildlife series include:

Also see:

Small Grain Production Guide No. 7, Disease Identification, AG-419-7